Creationism, Intelligent Design, Science, Cosmology, Philosophy and True Knowledge
April 10, 2008 in Creationism, Intelligent Design, PHILOSOPHY, THE SIMPSONS NEWS
THE SIMPSONS NEWS
What a surprise, it looks like we are behind on the show as always. *being sarcastic here, obviously* It’s getting closer to the deadline and we have a long way to go. It’s hard to know what to do when this happens. On the one had I can speed up, but when I do that, I make bigger mistakes and my work isn’t as good. On the other hand, I want to do a good job and make as few mistakes as I can and that usually means working a little slower. I guess the trick is, to find the right balance.
I managed to finish the train scenes from last week and as a reward, I got much more complicated versions of similar scenes. More trains, more cars, more technical camera movement. It’s fine though. I don’t mind. It’s a nice brake from always drawing characters and I’m looking forward to them.
I’m very inspired by Japanese cartoons (anime) that have giant robots or other complicated cool looking machines which are drawn by hand. They, almost always, look amazing and I’m in awe of the artists that draw them. Drawing cars and trains is the closest I get to doing that. When I see the complicated machines in anime I think to myself, if they can draw those complicated machines as good as that, surely I can attempt to draw the machines I have, just as good. So I sit at my desk and pretend I’m a Japanese animator working on anime and suddenly, drawing machines is fun.
PHILOSOPHY
At work, the topic of Evolution came up. By Evolution I mean, a process whereby life arose from nonliving matter and subsequently developed entirely by natural means. We also talked about Creationism, by which I mean, a religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by God literally as it happened in the book of Genesis, without need for Evolution. These topics came up in reference to an upcoming documentary called Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Here’s the trailer for it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGCxbhGaVfE
I find it odd, as a Catholic, that Creationists don’t do what many Catholics do and allow for the possibility of evolution being part of the intelligent design processes. By Intelligent Design I mean, the assertion that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. As Catholics we must believe in Intelligent Design but not necessarily in Creationism (although if we wish to, that’s allowed as well, though I’ve never seen it encouraged). For more info on this topic see The Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 279-324. On the other hand, I find it annoying that everyone tends to get all up in arms if someone questions the Evolutionary theory. After all, it’s still a theory. In fact, there is a very controversial book written by a Catholic Biochemistry Professor, Michael J. Behe by the name of Darwin’s Black Box that does exactly that. It questions Evolution. On the one hand, scientists have noted that the contents of the book is not science (with good reason. I think they are right, it’s not science. I explain myself more below). On the other hand it does bring up good arguments that blatantly show how far the Evolutionary theory has to go before it could be proven factual. Understandably, since the book claims to be scientific, it has outraged the scientific community.
Creationists want Creationism and/or Intelligent Design to be taught in science classes (to a Creationist, Intelligent Design and Creationism are often synonymous, even though they are not). I don’t think that’s a good idea. Not because they are not valid systems of thought but because they go beyond the limitations of science. They are Cosmology. By Cosmology I mean, “the branch of philosophy and metaphysics that deals with the world as the totality of all phenomena in space and time. It addresses questions about the Universe which are beyond the scope of science.” The Creationists and the proponents of Intelligent Design have their definitions mixed up. Personally I think that Intelligent Design (and even Creationism) should be taught in school, but in Philosophy classes not in a science classes. This, of course, requires that Philosophy be taught in school in the first place and it’s NOT. Cosmology, ontology, metaphysics, logic, rhetoric, ethics, should all be taught, why aren’t they? They used to be.
By definition Science mean, The investigation of natural phenomena through observation, theoretical explanation, and experimentation, or the knowledge produced by such investigation. Science makes use of the scientific method, which includes the careful observation of natural phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis, the conducting of one or more experiments to test the hypothesis, and the drawing of a conclusion that confirms or modifies the hypothesis.. This means that science is limited to the material world and will only produce knowledge of the material because it only studies natural phenomena (as opposed to supernatural phenomena). It is utterly useless for proving immaterial things like: truth, beauty, wisdom, God…etc. because none of these things have any material form that a scientist can experiment on and test. So unless a proponent of, say, Intelligent Design, can physically produce the actual designer of the universe to be examined, he’s out of luck.
This begs the question: If Creationism and Intelligent Design are Cosmological arguments, why are people trying to shove them into scientific debate? Because philosophy isn’t taught in school so people are trying somewhere to teach Cosmology. The solution, therefore would be to teach philosophy in schools.
I propose this answer to the question, because there is an erroneous idea, in just about all people’s minds, that scientific knowledge is the only kind of knowledge that counts. The moment you bring up philosophy, most people roll their eyes and don’t want anything to do with it. Either because they think it’s too complicated to understand, or because they think that it brings forth no true certainty and therefore has no practical use, or because they believe that philosophy holds no true knowledge, only mere opinion. Ironically, these points of view are philosophical in nature, showing how easy and practical it is to adhere to a philosophical view point.
Where did these points of view come from? Philosophers of course. Which ones? Well according to Dr. Mortimer J. Adler, they came from Hume and Kant. The following is a long excerpt from Dr. Adler‘s book, Ten Philosophical Mistakes. I copied down a large chunk of his argument because I think it’s a really important, critical topic to discuss. I wanted to really hit home the problem we modern people have when thinking about knowledge when it comes to philosophy and science, as well as show how the problem can be solved. Dr. Adler here, will first site a quote from Hume and then he will proceed to analyze it:
This brings [Hume] to his thundering conclusion in the last paragraph of the Enquiry:
“When we run over our libraries, persuaded of these principles, what havoc must we make? If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.”
Before we continue, I can’t help but interrupt. After reading Hume‘s statement, I’ve noticed that it doesn’t contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number nor does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence, therefore by Hume‘s own criteria, we must commit his statement to the flames: for it is nothing but sophistry and illusion. Way to contradict yourself Hume (Sorry, I kept reading the statement over and over and I had to point that out because it was bugging me). Okay, now back to Dr. Adler‘s analysis of Hume’s statement:
The line that divides what deserves to be honored and respected as genuine knowledge from what should be dismissed as mere opinion (or worse, as sophistry and illusion) is determined by two criteria. (1) It is knowledge and can be called science if it deals solely with abstractions and involves no judgments about matters of fact or real existence. Here we have mathematics and , together with it, the science of logic. (2) It is knowledge, if it deals with particular facts, as history and geography do, or with general facts as physics and chemistry do.
In both cases, it is knowledge only to the extent that it is based upon experimental reasoning, involving empirical investigations of the kind that occur in laboratories and observatories, or methodical investigations of the kind conducted by historians and geographers.
What did Hume exclude from the realm of Knowledge? Even though he refers to what he calls “natural Philosophy,” which in his century was identical with what we have come to call physical science, his intention was to reject as sophistry and illusion, or at least as mere opinion, what in antiquity and in the Middle Ages was traditional philosophy, including here a philosophy of nature, or physics that is not experimental and does not rely on empirical investigations, as well as metaphysics and philosophical theology.
This view of knowledge and opinion comes down to us in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the form of a doctrine that has been variously called positivism or scientism. The word positivism derives its meaning from the fact that the experimental or investigative sciences, and other bodies of knowledge, such as history, that rely upon investigation and research, came to be called positive sciences.
Positivism, then, is the view that the only genuine knowledge of reality or of the world of observable phenomena (i.e., matters of fact and existence) is to be found in the positive sciences. Mathematics and logic are also genuine knowledge, but they are not knowledge of the world of observable phenomena, or of matters of fact and real existence. The twentieth-century form of scientism or positivism thus came to be called “ logical positivism.”
Here we have one facet of the mistake about knowledge and opinion, the other facet of which is to be found in Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The latter is by far the more serious and the more far-reaching in its consequences.
He then goes on to explain the three errors Kant made in trying to fix some of Hume‘s ideas. The worst of which being, the substitution of idealism for realism. In other words since what we observe and take into our minds is not reality but a picture of reality, and since we “idealize” it once it’s in our mind, what we know is an ideal not the real.
Dr. Adler then goes on to solve the problem:
Let us return to the focal point for the this discussion—the distinction between knowledge and mere opinion. On the one hand, we have self-evident truths that have certitude and incorrigibility; and we also have truths that are still subject to doubt but that are supported by evidence and reasons to a degree that puts them beyond reasonable doubt or at the least gives them predominance over contrary views. All else is mere opinion—with no claim to being knowledge or having any hold on truth.
There is no question that the finding and conclusions of historical research are knowledge in this sense; no question that the findings and conclusion of the experimental or empirical sciences, both natural and social, are knowledge in this sense.
As contrasted with such knowledge, which is knowledge of reality or, as Hume would say, knowledge of matter of fact and real existence, mathematics and logic are also knowledge, but not of reality. They do not depend upon investigative research for their finds and conclusions.
The question that remains to be answered is the one that, in my judgment, Hume and Kant answered erroneously, an answer that has persisted in various forms down to our own day. Where does speculative or theoretical philosophy (by which I mean philosophical physics, metaphysics, and philosophical theology) stand in this picture? Is it mere opinion or is it genuine knowledge, knowledge that, like the empirical sciences, is knowledge of reality?—-
—-In the first place, what has been overlooked is the distinction between common and special experience.
Dr. Adler then goes to define common experience as, that which all people experience everyday without really looking to experience it. While special experience is the kind of experience that a scientist might get in a lab through experimentation. He then continues:
With this distinction in mind, between special and common experience, between experience resulting from investigation efforts and experience enjoyed without such efforts, we can distinguish between modes of knowledge that, while depending on experience as well as upon reflective thought, rely on different types of experience.
Mathematics is a case in point. Mathematical research is carried on mainly by reflective and analytical thought, but it also relies on some experience—the common experience that all human being have. Mathematicians do not engage in empirical investigation. They need no special data of observation. Mathematics can be called an armchair science, and yet some experience—the common experience of mankind—lies behind the reflective and analytical thought in which the mathematician engages.
Speculative or theoretical philosophy, like mathematics, is a body of knowledge that can be produced in an armchair or at a desk. The only experience that the philosopher needs for the development of his theories or the support of his conclusions is the common experience of mankind. Reflecting on such experience and proceeding by means of rational analysis and argument, the philosopher reaches conclusions in a manner that resembles the procedure of the mathematician, not that of the empirical scientist.
However, we must not fail to note one important difference, a difference that aligns the theoretical philosopher with the empirical scientist rather than with the mathematician. Unlike mathematics, but like empirical science, theoretical philosophy claims to be knowledge of reality.
In the light of what has just been said, we can divide the sphere of knowledge into (1) bodies of knowledge that are methodically investigative and (2) bodies of knowledge that are noninvestigative and that employ only common, not special, experience. To the first group belong history, geography, and all the empirical sciences, both natural and social. To the second group belong mathematics, logic, and theoretical philosophy.
If the division is made in terms of whether the body of knowledge claims to have a hold on truth about reality, then theoretical philosophy, even though it is noninvestigative in method, belongs with history, geography, and the empirical sciences.
Each of these disciplines, according to its distinctive character, has a method peculiarly its own and , according to limitations of that method, can answer only certain questions, not others. The kind of questions that philosopher or the mathematician can answer without any empirical investigation whatsoever cannot be answered by the empirical scientist, and, conversely, the kind of questions that the scientist can answer by his methods of investigation cannot be answered by the philosopher or the mathematician.
Dr. Adler wrote, that a man by the name of Sir Karl Popper said there was only one line of demarcation between knowledge and mere opinion which was: falsifiability by empirical evidence, by observed phenomena. An opinion, a view, a theory, that cannot be thus falsified is not knowledge, but mere opinion, neither true nor false in any objective sense of those terms. But Dr. Adler believes there are more lines of demarcation:
Another is refutability by rational argument. The only irrefutable truths we possess are the very few self-evident propositions that have certitude, finality, incorrigibility. Since our knowledge of reality, whether scientific or philosophical, does not consist exclusively of self-evident truths nor does it consist of conclusions demonstrated to be true, scientific and philosophical theories or conclusions must be refutable in three ways.
One way is falsification by experience which produces evidence contrary to the evidence that has been employed to support the opinion that claims to be true and to have the status of knowledge. A second way is by rational argument, which advances reasons that correct and replace the reasons advanced to support the opinion that claims to be true and have the status of knowledge. The third way is a combination of the first and the second—new and better evidence, together with new and better reasons for holding a view contrary to the one that has been refuted.
Opinion that cannot be refuted in one or another of theses three ways are not knowledge, but mere opinion.
Were this not so, this book would be fraudulent in its claim to point out philosophical mistakes and to correct them by offering evidence and reasons to expose their errors. Nor could we replace them with views that are true or more nearly true.
If philosophy were mere opinion there would be no philosophical mistakes, erroneous views, false doctrines. There would be no way of substituting views or doctrines more nearly true because they employed insights and appealed to distinctions that for one reason or another were not in the possession of those who made the mistakes.
All this just to say that a good philosophical argument can put forth as true a knowledge as Science. Which leads me to say something to the small group of Creationist and the Intelligent Design proponent that are really loud and are making all the other Creationist and Intelligent Design proponents look bad; stop forcing the enormity of Metaphysical Cosmology into the tiny hole of science. Science can only show proofs of the material, not the immaterial. Use Philosophy instead. That’s what it’s good at, that’s what it’s for. It’s okay to use science as your data base, just don’t call your conclusions scientific. They may be true, they just aren’t scientific.
To the small group of scientists who by being loud about their mocking of advocates of Intelligent Design, make the entirety of the scientific community look bad, I would like to say, stop assuming that you hold a monopoly on the only means of gathering truth. That truth exists, that truth is rational, that it’s understandable and that it can be taught, are the foundations of science itself and yet these are philosophical propositions that can’t be proven scientifically, but must be proven by good rational argument. Which is what the proponents of Intelligent Design are trying to do, only sometimes in a misguided way.
*EDIT: And by the way, until there is empirical scientific proof that Evolution is true, rather than just the inferring that its true based on scientific data, the Evolutionary theory is also a Cosmological, philosophical conclusion, not a scientific one.*
If you like what you read, please consider signing up to my rss feed.
If you would like to have a text ad on my site, click on the red BUY LINKS button under the Archives list.
And while you’re at it, please Digg me too.
Dr. Adler was a brilliant and prolific author, educator, philosopher, and lecturer. He wrote more than 50 books and 200 articles, all of which can be read with pleasure and profit.
For more information on Mortimer Adler and his work, visit http://www.thegreatideas.org , The Center for the Study of The Great Ideas
Ken Dzugan
Senior Fellow and Archivist
The Center for the Study of The Great Ideas
Dr. Adler rocks! I’ve read three of his books and I’m eager to read more of them.
I’m glad you made that last point in your edit, that (at least some versions of) the theory of evolution are philosophical and cosmological in nature rather than scientific. That is why people keep wanting to bring up creationism and intelligent design in the science classroom, even if they’re not science: because the evolutionist has already brought in his cosmology, so why can’t they?
Hey Luis,
I’m passing along an article that was passed down to me today about a legislation once Congress passes it, and I quote from Mark Simon from Animation World Magazine, “YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!”
The legislation is called “Orphan Works” which has been sent in motion since 2006. It has been called a “Trojan Horse” because it is under a guise of what appears to be a benevolent measure. Once you read this and find out how you can fight this pass the info to AS MANY ARTISTS YOU CAN. I know it sounds melodramatic but the threat is too big to ignore because companies can take your artwork and use it without paying you one cent. And the worst part is you can’t sue them!
So here are the links:
http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=3605&page=1
http://www.sellyourtvconceptnow.com/orphan.html
Thanks for the comment leah, I was wondering if anyone would leave a comment at all, over what I wrote. Your point is a good one. In fact, the reason I put the edit, was because my wife pointed that very same thing out to me after she read my post. She gave me such a big speech about it that I asked her to write it up so I could put it in next week’s blog post. She’s agreed to do so. I’m looking for it. She’s smarter and far more educated than I am so it should be pretty good.
Thanks Bill, I’ll take a look at the link.
Luis, here’s a Wikipedia link that outlines the general problems of this act. The most disturbing part of this bill is that is that it could also include family albums that are put up online, anybody that has uploaded their own personal video on YouTube, and so forth can be called “Orphan Work” unless you pay and register each and every single piece. And EVEN THEN there are loopholes around it that can still make your work exploitable by others! So spread the word…now it’s more than just artists in general, it will effect EVERYONE that has taken a picture, video, or put up that drawing your kid did from school on the refrigerator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_works
Oh, uh ignore that last post. That’s just the definition of an orphan work not the measure that’s in the process of getting passed. I totally misread that! Other than that the rest of the post is true when the “Orphan Works” bill passes any image, video, or artwork you create cannot be claimed by you unless you pay and register every single one of them.
Bill, I’ve been looking into what you sent me and it’s pretty bad stuff. Thanks for the info.
You’re welcome, Luis. Right now more people need to know about this, even from other countries. For example an artist from Japan can have his work be commercially exploited here in the U.S. by any company simply because his artwork was not registered in a private registry thereby making it an “Orphan Work” even if he had copyrighted in Japan. And in this measure the company cannot be sued for Copyright Infringement by this artist because the Copyright Law has been retroactively nullified his rights here in the U.S.
That being said the Orphan Work measure is being revamped for another review so we don’t know for sure if those elements I’ve just said has been removed. Right now all we can do is wait until the measure is revealed so that we can see the details before writing to our Senators. They won’t read your letter unless you specify what measure number it is and what aspects in that bill will affect you personally.
THEORY Of UNIVERSE FLUXONÁRIO ESTRUTURANTE From the DENSE SPACE, and
THEORY Of the ENERGETICIDADE and MASER.
Author – Ancelmo Graceli Luiz.
Ancelmoluizgraceli@hotmail.com
Tel. 27- 32167566 Street Itabira, nº 5, Itapemirim Set, Rose of the
Penha, Cariacica, -269, E.S. cep.29143 Brazilian, professor,
graduation in philosophy and theoretical researcher. Published books
ASTRONOMY, and WORLD Of the PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS.
Collaborator – Marcio Piter Rangel.
Presented work the SECT- Spirit Brazil Saint. E the Brazilian Society
of Physics. Introduction published in the WEB for the Vestibule Brazil
Factor – Channel Profile. In day 30.01.2008. If other theories with
beddings and you formulate had had acceptance, why these will not
have? Therefore, it possesss all the beddings and all the forms of
calculations, and that the reality and the comment until today reached
are confirmed with. With more than one hundred and ten formulas, the
most varied forms of if calculating one same phenomenon, with more
than two hundred beddings in all the areas of the modern physics.
Also, with new forecasts inside of cosmology and astronomy.
Presented the Magazine of Education of the SBFISICA. Soced. Bras. de
Física. Brazilian Journal of Physics – SBFISICA
PRESENTATION.
The theories defend the power vital the holy ghost and on cosmo, the
life, the mind and everything more, against the mecanicismo and the
materialism. With forceful beddings on possibilities of as everything
it possesss an origin and an aiming for the power the holy ghost in
route the life, the harmony, the perfection, the improvement and the
eternity in detriment to the chaos and the end.
In cosmology the universe is defended that if structure as a stream of
production and destruction of astros. In astronomy it is defended that
the movement is produced by the proper energy of astro. INTRODUCTION.
THEORY Of the ORIGIN Of the SUBSTANCE And the COSMO, And UNIVERSE
FLUXONÁRIO ESTRUTURANTE.
This theory is the one that more is come close to the power of God.
Therefore it goes against any form of chaos.
OF THE ALMOST NOTHING EVERYTHING CAN APPEAR – EXCEPT GOD.
The UNIVERSE Is An AUTO CREATION, HOWEVER, A WORKMANSHIP Of This
TRANSPORT ALONE CAN HAVE the POWER Of the CREATOR.
This theory goes of meeting to the harmony and cosmic eternity in
detriment to the chaos and the finitude of the universe considered for
the theory of the great explosion. While one enters in stream of
disintegration and reintegration with little energy, others are born
more distant from the aglutinação of the dense space.
COSMO ESTRUTURANTE And DESINTEGRANTE.
Graceliano Model. The universe is constant and infinite stream.
First part.
THEORY Of the BUBBLE OF DENSE SPACE And ENERGY.
While in the theory of the great explosion the universe if expands
from a point of the space and a small amount of energy, and is the one
only – OF OUTSIDE FOR INSIDE – In the theory of the bubble universe if
it contracts from the dense space to produce the substance and the
energy of some points of the infinite of the space, in a constant
production of new universes in some points of cosmo. Or either, it
contracts itself to produce the substance stops later forming the
astros and if expanding for the maser. E is some universes in infinite
points of cosmo in infinite phases.
Of birth in the phase bubble of dense space – phase estruturante-Na
energy phase, In the phase of substance and the phase of
disintegration, unfastening and removal in the space for the proper
maser of the density of the substance. E reintegration forming
secondary from the material radiated for the elementary school.
PASSES FOR FORMATION Of the SUBSTANCE, ELEMENTS, ASTROS And The
UNIVERSES.
Thus, the dense space if contracts until to be filamentoso – the
diffuse substance arrives – dense substance – energy – diffuse cores –
astros – nuclear fusing – chemical elements – of light elements in
weighed – maser – reengrupamentos in new astros, secondary – it comes
back if to disintegrate – and the process continues until if becoming
diffuse substance.
COMMENT.
We do not feel the action of the dense space because we are in a
universe in a phase that
already it was changedded into substance.
FORMULA FOR CONTRACTION OF DENSE SPACE.
The dense space if contracts and diminishes of size to produce the
substance, and if it gives in a contraction and infinite reduction,
that can be calculated with formulates of the infinitesimal limit. But
one it has all left, divided for all, thus infinitely.
Dense space ED – total part p dense space if structuralizing. Thus,
infinitely, until changedding into energy and substance.
ED – P/ED… until arriving to be energy and substance.
Thus, we have the formula for formation of the substance, energy and
for origin of the universe.
INFINITE UNIVERSES IN PHASES ESTRUTURANTES And DESINTEGRANTES.
FIRST THEORY Of the ORIGIN And NATURE Of the SUBSTANCE.
It was always looked by the philosophers and Greek chemistries, later
for the modern physics an explanation for the origin, nature and
essence of the substance, where the world at times was divided in form
and structure, spirit, mind and substance, therefore I show the first
theory of that the substance can appear and of that it is formed, that
here is of filaments of dense space, always looked to the substance
for the substance and dividiz it infinitely of the atom of the Greeks
until the hundred of particles that they are catalogued today. Comment
– no theory displayed until today obtained to give a recital from that
it originated the substance. All leave soon of the estimated one of
something.
CALCULATION OF FORMATION OF SUBSTANCE And FOR COSMO ESTRUTURANTE.
To be able of contraction of the dense space = amount of dense
space/cosmological time = estruturante substance and cosmo and phases.
CALCULATION FOR COSMO DESINTEGRANTE.
To be able of disintegration = amount of substance, temperature,
fusing core to estelar, maser and energy/cosmological time.
Pd*[qm ]/t c.
DENSE SPACE And SUBSTANCE, And ENERGY And ASTROS.
Universe not formed from great explosion, but yes of space dense,
space dense is all space that in it surrounds them, that we have the
notion that it is a great emptiness, but is not, it possesss density,
and of it the substance and the energy if they had originated to form
the first astros, galaxies and accumulations.
ROTATION And TRANSLATION Of the UNIVERSE.
The expansion is false, is in the truth a translation and rotation and
a minimum of removal.
What we have the notion of a great expansion of the universe is in the
truth the translation and rotation of exactly. Therefore, if it is
infinitely old and had started if to expand at the moment of supposed
a great explosion, the astros would be so distant ones of the others
that nor its light would be capable to be picked-up by any type of
telescope.
The FORMAT Of the UNIVERSE.
The disposal of the galaxies in disks with the systems of stars also
in disk test that the universe is a estruturação process and passes
for streams, therefore had appeared at one alone moment in a great
explosion the format of the universe would be spherical, or either
with all the astros in one same distancia of a center, and as also
with the same translation and rotation.
Comment. Already we have here a recital of the origin and of that
material cosmo if formed. Beddings not displayed until today for other
theories.
The ENERGY PRODUCES the MASER THAT PRODUCES the REMOVAL MINIMUM.
It has yes a minimum removal proceeding from the action of the maser
and high temperatures, removal produced for the processed energy for
nuclear fusing in the inward of the astros.
UNIVERSE OF ENERGY ESTRUTURANTE. OR UNIVERSE OF CONTRACTION And
DISINTEGRATION.
The universe passes for two processes – first of the formation of the
substance and the energy for the contraction of the filaments of the
dense space.
As of the formation of the astros, its processes of energy and
production of temperature to the ratio that the substance if
agglutinates, with the agglutinated substance are produced great
amount of energy and temperature, giving sprouting the maser and the
consequent disintegration of astro in the space. For that the universe
is a stream of estruturante energy, where first if it contracts stops
later if disintegrating and if moving away ones from the others,
always in lesser portions.
It is A STREAM WHY IF I CONTRACTED OF DENSE SPACE UNTIL the SUBSTANCE,
OF SUBSTANCE IN ASTRO, IF IT DISINTEGRATES IN MASER, IT COMES BACK the
REINTEGRAR-SE IN LESSER ASTROS And WITH LITTLE DIÃMETRO And ENERGY,
THAT DESINTEGRAR-SE COMES BACK. E STREAM CONTINUES INFINFINITAMENTE.
UNTIL IF BECOMING DIFFUSE SUBSTANCE.
The same process passes particles and atoms.
The PRODUCTION Of SECONDARY For the MASER And the ATMOSPHERE.
Part of the maser if also transforms into atmosphere, that always goes
to direct for the equator, where goes to form cinturões of gases as
it is the Jupiter case, or in a more advanced period of training the
cinturões go to form rings that is the Saturn case and Uranus, of
these rings go to form small accumulations of gases, that always more
will go to agglutinate themselves more and, where will appear the
first rarefied cores, and the aglutinação process continues, where
the secondary ones start to appear exactly before if forming, as gases
they already possess translation and rotation and if they move away
from the elementary schools. Or either, before existing as astro the
secondary one already develops its translation.
TEST For FORMAT And DINÃMICA Of the ATMOSPHERE.
This can be confirmed with the Land, where its atmosphere already less
concentrates more in the equator and in the polar regions, proceeding
from the magnetism of the Land and centrifuga action of the rotation,
and that the atmosphere possesss proper dynamics. That it will be
filamentará until arriving to give beginning to a new satellite.
However this is not for today. The MAGNETISM Of the ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SPEEDS UP the FORMATION Of the SECONDARY One.
If it was not the magnetism and the centrifuga action of the rotation
of the astros, its secondary ones would delay time not to form
themselves. Therefore the magnetism and action centrifugam act in the
production of the filaments of gases for the equator and in the
production of these filaments in the esferificação process, where
rarefied cores will appear, until forming new astros.
E the stream continues of disintegration of the elementary school for
maser proceeding from the energy production, for the production of
atmosphere and aglutinação in filaments for the magnetism and
centrifuga action of the rotation of proper astro until arriving the
esferificação, also through the magnetism of the gases.
PHASES OF THE STREAM.
1 – with the contraction of the filaments of the dense space to form
the substance and after the produced substance if form in astros. With
the formed astros they pass if to disintegrate as form of maser and
temperature.
2- the material of the disintegration comes back if to contract and to
produce astros lesser, and of these other minors the process
continues. This if confirms where the astros possess the spherical
format. Therefore the rounding sample that had a slow process of
formation through materials that had appeared of are for inside, where
slowly for aglutinação astro was if structuralizing. They confirm
because the cores are denser and the Land is formed by layers and
cores.
In the case of the production of the planets for the Sun, the
atmosphere nor arrived if to form, and the maser was soon if
filamentando to esferificar and to appear the planets.
INFINITE UNIVERSE In the AGE, the SPACE, And the PROCESSING.
The esferificação test that astro was produced by layers of material
of maser for juxtaposition – one on the other, for that the cores are
denser, that were already proven in the physics of the atom. E the
rounding test that took much more time this circular formation, then
the universe is a much more slow and constant process that if can
imagine. Thus, the rounding of the universe proves the theory of the
stream and that all the universe of today did not appear at one alone
moment, they are some universes in some phases if processing and if
structuralizing, while some age for lose and energy processing, others
they appear for the dense space. These phases if confirm for the
current comment, thus the universe are infinite in the origin and the
end, the space and its processing.
PHASES OF THE UNIVERSE. UNIVERSES BUBBLE ESTRUTURANTE And FLUXONÁRIO.
1- Origin – universe bubble of dense space and bubble of energy. 2-
Type – estruturante fluxonário, if contracts to produce the substance
from the bubble of the dense space. Later if it after expands the
contraction and production of energy, temperature and maser. 3- Form
to exist – production processes energy. 4- Amount – some types in some
phases, of the bubble until astro almost without energy. 5- Size –
infinite in the production of new universes, the infinite in the space
and the time. 6- Form – infinite and varied forms, of bubbles, gases,
diffuse energy, dense and less dense substance, astros, rings, maser,
atmosphere, etc. 7- estruturante of the substance and cosmo.
MAGICAL CREATION – SUBSTANCE From The DENSE SPACE.
Before if speaking of the creation of the universe, it must be spoken
of the creation of the energy and the substance, therefore it was from
the substance that appeared the astros.
ROUNDING And ESFERIFICAÇÃO Of the ASTROS.
The esferificação of astros the test that,
1- It was formed for a slow process to have the spherical format, of
the the opposite it would not be.
2- It was formed of minimum parts that had been if joust locating to
form astro, of the the opposite would not have the round formation.
One sees that while Saturn and Uranus possesss rings of gases in the
route of the equator, Jupiter it possesss an atmosphere stack that is
in movement in the route of the equator, where if confirms the origin
of the astros for components of the elementary school.
3- the astros are older of the one than if it thinks. E its core is
denser of the one than the exterior part, and the planet Land is
formed by formed layers on.
4- Fiz a calculation for the age of the Land, however was taken in
account only the removal, and not it time for the esferificação,
that probably was very bigger.
5- Test that the universe has its origin through very small elements,
that had been if joining to form the astros, as minimum parts of
maser, gases, light and leftovers of great temperatures.
6- the universe is had There if forming for minimum parts, as energy
and substance, of inside for exterior part is with the cores denser
than the crust -. A much more old, round and infinite universe in the
end and origin time, the infinite in relation its production, then,
that it would never appear at one alone moment in a great explosion.
MASER IN THE FORMATION OF SECONDARY.
Thus, with the format of the astros if it has plus a test of the
theory of the estruturante fluxonário universe. For compression of
the dense space, and disintegration for the maser and temperature, and
a new compression of this maser in the space, forming new lesser
astros, as planets, satellites and comets. E the estruturante and
desintegrante process continues producing asteroids and others that
will always be disintegrated producing astros and lesser asteroids.
Universes alone of dense space, gases, energy, diffuse substance,
substance exist and astros and gases, light and maser, with this if it
confirms the theory here supported of that the universe does not have
age, therefore it is an infinite production and disintegration of
itself exactly. E while some disintegrate others in other points of
the infinite of the space starts if to form slowly for the dense
space.
If cosmo was produced at one alone moment, the astros would not have a
spherical form so defined, some would be long and flattened others.
ON The DENSE SPACE, SUBSTANCE And ENERGY.
The energy exists in function of the substance, since its production
until its carrier also for air, therefore the substance contains and
produze the energy, therefore the energy does not have as to exist
without the substance, and the substance if originates and is
densificado dense space.
SUBSTANCE And ENERGY = DENSE SPACE DENSIFICADO.
It does not have as to speak of a universe that if it originates from
a small ball in a great explosion, therefore which the origin of this
ball, and gives where came the energy for explodiz it.
The great explosion contains varies contradictions and lack of origin
beddings, cause and effect.
INTERPLANETARY And SPACE ATMOSPHERE.
The interplanetary space is constituted of gas to one [ pressure of
ten raised to less 19 terrestrial atmospheres ]. That is a route that
the space is not an emptiness without density, pressure, and is not a
vacuum.
PLEA. If the gravitation attracted the astros, all the satellites
would be plumb between the planet and the Sun, therefore the planet
would hold of a side and the Sun of another one, and would be
constantly in eclipse. Therefore that the dynamics depends on the
energy and maser of astro. To see theory of the energeticidade and
maser.
THUS WE HAVE THE PHASES OF THE UNIVERSE.
The filamentosa space phase of density. The energy phase space
filamentosa. The phase of the materiality – chemical atoms, and
elements. The phase of immense astros, with little density, and little
maser. The phase of the aglutinação, where the substance was if
agglutinating, magnifying the internal temperature and the maser. The
phase of the disintegration for the internal temperature and maser.
The phase of formation of new astros for the aglutinação of the
expelled material of the maser of the first astros, thus we see that
it is a stream and process of integration, disintegration and new
aglutinações.
DIRECT FORMATION For The DENSE SPACE, And FORMATION OF SECONDARY For
The FORMED SUBSTANCE ALREADY.
The material that already became astro after does not come back to be
dense space the disintegration, but this material if integrates
forming new lesser astros.
Thus it has two processes. 1- the process of direct formation for the
dense space. 2- and the process for the disintegration of astro
already produced, that it goes to reintegrate themselves and to form
other minors.
Thus, the dense space is an immense one all, as an immense jelly
without definite form. The universe is a process of direct form for
the dense space, and a cycle process, where some are disintegrated and
part of its material goes to construct others. With this we see that
the origin, production and time of the universe are infinite, and the
system of production of universes is much more old of that if it
imagines, in trillions of years.
E that exists some types of universes, ones of dense space, field of
energy without substance, field of energy with substance, universes of
atomic cores, gases, substance and astros if disintegrating and
integrating others.
COSMIC EVOLUTION And EVOLUTION Of The CHEMICAL ELEMENTS.
Thus, the universe is a constant production and of cosmic evolution,
direct production and disintegration, and secondary production of
integration in new astros, while the chemical elements go if
processing and evolving.
ON the REMOVAL.
The universe did not suffer a great explosion to produce its removal,
but yes, the removal is product of the maser, rotation and of the
great temperatures, that stimulate the astros for front, modifying its
orbit. Or either, the nuclear fusing, the production of temperature
and maser produce the lowermost removal between the astros. For that
it has a ratio enters the distancias of the planets and satellites.
PLEA.
If the universe had suffered to a great explosion alone the galaxies
would be if moving away, and the lesser astros as planets, comets and
satellites would not be if moving away, and the gradual removal proves
that all the astros if find in removal ones in relation to the others,
thus, all the astros if they find in removal proceeding from its
energy, maser and external temperature.
PLEA.
APPEARANCE To the RED For the EFFECT DOPPLER For the ROTATION And
TRANSLATION Of the COSMO.
The front that the universe does not meet in expansion, but yes in
minimum removal will be seen more, and what it is detected as
appearance to the red nor it is this removal. Therefore it is
insignificant in whom he refers to to the shift in the space, and what
it gives the appearance to the red in Doppler effect is the shift of
the translation and rotation of astros and galaxies in the space.
REMOVAL FOR THE ACTION OF THE MASER.
We see then that, the universe is a constant creation for filaments of
dense space of new new substances and the cosmos for the aglutinação
of the casting and reintegrated materials already, while other cosmos
more evolved if disintegrates for maser and high temperature, other
lesser astros if they integrate with the material of that already they
had been disintegrated and that they go to develop a next orbit to
that gave to origin and initial impulse to it, for the maser and
intense temperature. Thus one forms a direct production for the dense
space, and a production for cycle of disintegration and integration
for the disintegrated material, while the chemical elements evolve. E,
while the universe if widens for the maser produced for the proper
astros. E not for supposed a great explosion, therefore the removal is
a process continues for the action of the maser, therefore that it
decreases gradually and the initial impulse only tends to lose
intensity. While the material universe if expands, the universe of
filaments of the dense space if contracts, or either, it has two
reverse situations.
The maser is proceeding mainly from the interactions of nuclear fusing
in the inward of the astros. Or either, the same phenomenon – the
maser – that it produces the orbit and the dynamics of the planets and
satellites, also produces the widening of the universe and produces
new astros, and is the producer of the structure of them, and of new
chemical elements. One concludes thus, that cosmo is infinite in its
origin and will be in its future, as also he is infinite in the space
and the new production of the cosmos, and new chemical elements. The
process of slow creation goes against the process of instantaneous
creation considered by the great explosion. To prove the displayed
thesis above it is simple, is alone to evidence that the expansion if
finds in decreasing progression. However as already it was seen, the
universe if finds in production and removal and not in expansion.
Thus, while one is disintegrated and gone to produce others in other
cantos of the universe the dense space if it processes giving to
origin the galaxies of space gases. Thus, the universe is a process of
direct birth for the dense space, of already been born, and birth of
born others from already. Everything occurs for a direct hashing of
the substance in the origin, is a fluxonária hashing in the
production of new chemical elements, new astros and new orbits. Second
part.
ON the SUBSTANCE.
M = ED = and/t – substance is equal the solidiquicado dense space,
that is equal to the energy divided for the time.
The substance is made solid energy dense space, or either, the
chemical particles and elements are in the truth the dense space if
processing energeticamente and producing solidification. E in a more
advanced evolutivo period of training. Thus, the substance passes for
a evolutivo process, and the substance – made solid energy dense space
– always meets in an improvement, and passes for a slow and unified
process therefore that all the substance and the structure of the atom
are equal.
PHASES OF FORMATION OF THE ASTROS.
Our universe did not initiate lowermost previous to a great explosion,
but yes, infinitely great, entering in a contraction to produce the
substance, passing for made solid energy that is the substance, it
stops later structuralizing itself in particles, elements chemical,
and finally astros.
Or either, the universe did not form astros instantaneamente,
therefore that the astros and atoms possess cores.
First it is formed energy, later the substance and finally the astros,
different of that it defends the great explosion.
Thus, the universe passes of the contraction. 1- of the space for
energy and the substance. 2- of the substance for astros.
After the disintegration through the maser and intense temperatures.
It passes to the integration, where new astros are formed from the
material of the maser. Thus, the universe and a stream of production
cycles and estruturação and evolution, through. 1 – Contraction and
solidification. 2 – Chemical evolution. 3 – Disintegration, removal
and dynamics of the universe for the energy and maser. 4 – E
integration in new astros.
E that the orbit, the dynamics, the removal and the disintegration of
the universe are proceeding from the energy and maser, becoming the
universe of flattened structure, where the astros already are
structuralized and in gradual removal as he is ours, while others are
to circulate and in formation through gases, and others with
tentáculos as great galaxies.
COSMOFÍSICA and ASTROPHYSICS.
PRODUCER OF ITSELF.
The universe is an alive and dynamic system of production and
estruturação, where it produces its proper energy for its
functioning, estruturação and dynamics, being that the energy
magnifies to the ratio that goes carrying through its functioning, and
is a stream system, where the same interaction that produces the
elements chemical, produces the astros for fusing. E also produces
fields, maser, high temperatures, dynamics, orbits, structures of the
astros, and the removal in the universe. Or either, it is a producer
of itself, its structure and its functioning. Thus, it is a constant
production of integration and disintegration.
AGE OF THE UNIVERSE.
With this, it can be deduced that the universe does not possess an
origin determined in the time, much less in some place of the space,
and it does not possess an origin determined in the estruturação of
the substance and the astros that compose it. However, it has infinite
age, therefore the dense space always was there and producing energy,
substance, until arriving the astros.
FORM OF BEING OF THE UNIVERSE
Of contraction for the dense space. Of removal for the maser.
Of aglutinação for the material of the maser.
The universe passes for streams while it produces the chemical
elements in the interactions of nuclear fusing in the center of the
astros, where produces energy when processing the physical
interactions and to produce its structure of astros, orbits and
dynamics.
ON the MOVEMENT
If the related movement this with the maser, high
temperatures, and physical interactions in the inward of the astros
that are untied in the dense space to develop its dynamics. Soon the
movement is natural and dynamic, and varies as the situations of
energy production where if it finds astro. E if the dynamics obey a
stream, then the movement is dynamic, disforme and variable.
ON The DENSE SPACE.
Dense space produces the substance, while the produced substance
already produces the astros and the chemical elements go being casting
in the secondary stars and.
ON the SUBSTANCE
The substance is filaments of the contracted dense space, that
go to structuralize the chemical universe in substance, astros,
elements, maser, high temperature, and in the dynamic auto universe.
ON the COSMO
The universe is auto dynamic and while it produces the energy
the physical interactions go being processed, and the maser acting and
spreading the substance, the astros are in dynamics for the proper
energy and maser, the chemical elements evolve and if they improve,
improving the substance and structuralizing the universe, cosmo if
contracts for the dense space, and if it widens for the action of the
maser, then the universe is alive and auto dynamic.
ON the TIME
The time does not exist, what it exists is the timer of the
memory marked for the functioning of the brain as conscience form of
that happens between intervals of events. We can consider the
secondary time as something, that it exists in function of the
functioning of the conscience produced for the functioning of the
brain. The speed of the timer of the man is the speed of functioning
of the human brain.
ON the REMOVAL And WIDENING Of the COSMO.
Thus, the dynamics of the universe is proceeding from the constant
maser, therefore that its widening if finds in decreasing progression.
E the astros had appeared of the aglutinação of the dense space,
while the maser and the high temperatures disintegrate the astros.
Soon in the future and this part and period of training of the
universe where in we find them the astros will be more cold and
lesser.
Thus, the astros are untied and free in the space, and not imprisoned
for presumptions fields, where the rotation of the galaxies is minor
who the translation. While the substance appears of the dense space,
where the astros are produced, others is formed in other points of the
space, while the dynamics is common to all the astros and not only in
the galaxies. Test of this we have in the solar system. With this we
see that the widening is a constant production for the maser, and not
for supposed a great explosion. Therefore the same phenomenon that
produces the translation, rotation, orbits, also produces the
widening, therefore that the removal is gradual decreasing, it grows
gradually, however it has a percentage of decrease in the progression.
The universe will tend if to waste and if to dilute in lesser astros,
and with little energy, while in other parts it will initiate other
universes with the material of the dense space. The universe possesss
three basic forms of production 1 – structural, that it produces the
substance and of the form, 2-other of action who gives to life the
substance, that is the physical interactions, energy and maser in the
inward of the astros. 3 – of production of new astros and chemical
elements.
ON the FORMATION And AGE Of the ASTROS Of The SOLAR SYSTEM
It is confirmed that the asteroids are not perfectly round,
therefore in its majority are a little flattened and prolongated. One
confirms that they are resulted of expelled tablets of material of
some planet or the Sun, being masses inteiriça and produced of one
alone moment, while planets and satellites are astros round, where if
confirms that it had a slow formation of overlapping of components of
its elementary schools expelled for masers. This if confirms that the
spherical ones had taken more time to form themselves, and confirms
the displayed theory here.
Third part.
COSMOFÍSICA OF INTERACTIONS And ENERGY.
The universe could not appear of a ball of energy or substance to blow
up, therefore it would appear to the question, of where this ball
appeared of substance, and how much time it was there before the
explosion, and what it formed it.
We see that the production of the substance and energy is a constant
process of nuclear fusing, evolution of chemical elements and
estruturação of new astros and galaxies in the space and other
constant phenomena that form our slow universe. Soon, the universe is
without beginning and end, in the time, the space, the materialization
and production.
The phase of the astrophysics and cosmofísica, that is of the
production of energy, maser and of the disintegration for maser and
the integration of material with little temperature in the space, and
where the peripheral astros had appeared.
If the universe had appeared of a great explosion the substance
already would exist before the universe, and this not and possible of
being, what we see in the truth is that the substance is part of a
slow process, as the formation of the chemical elements is slow, as it
is slow and constant the formation of the astros and the proper
universe.
One of the forceful tests of the slow formation of the universe and
its beginning of is for inside if closing on itself until becoming
materialized, and that the astros are constituted of layers with
greaters and minors densities, some layers ones on the others, and a
gradual cooling until the inward of the astros. Soon, the universe
would not appear of a point, of inside for is.
STRUCTURES IN LAYERS.
Thus, the universe for being a slow process, and of is for inside and
done of layers, evidences in the rotation and dynamics of Saturn
rings, as also in the structure of the atom, and in the structure of
the planet Land, or same in the atmosphere of the Land and Jupiter.
The substance and the universe are made of are for inside for the
dense space, and the astros also for the material of the maser.
A great explosion would not give beginning to the universe, therefore
it was itself the case already would exist before the explosion, and
what he would produce the structure and the energy to blow up.
The chemical elements also weighed are products of a slow process of
formation.
PHASES – SOME UNIVERSES.
It has some universes. Of bubble of dense space, of energy of dense
space, and of the free substance in the space, and of the substance
estruturalizada in astros and the maser and high temperatures.
The fields, atoms, astros and proper cosmo as a whole are determined
by the energy and intensity of the physical interactions where they
meet as also the orbits, dynamic of the astros and atoms. Exactly the
evolution of the chemical elements and evolution of the substance and
astros and cosmo as a whole is resulted of the intensity of the
physical interactions and production of energy.
The stars shine thanks to the spontaneous nuclear fusing in its cores,
where light elements are transformed into chemical elements weighed.
We see in the universe that while stars diminish others blossom
everything this if it gives in a slow process of creation and hashing
in new elements and new astros.
With this cosmo if becomes the infinite in its origin and in the
production, we see that it has some types of older universes ones,
other new and other different ones, that it is created by a calm God,
constructing the cosmos, beings and souls for the good.
PLEA Of the EXPANSION.
What it gives an appearance to have an immense expansion are the
translation and the rotation of the galaxies, in the truth the
translation is immensely bigger that the removal between the astros.
If the astros were if moving away straight-line for the age proposal
until from the universe, all the astros would be so distant here that
would be impossible to see nor the Sun, the more the red of Doppler
effect. One concludes that the universe is not in expansion, but yes
in translation and rotation, and a minimum removal billions of lesser
times of that any translation.
All the galaxies are if opening as a sunflower, or either, if moving
away from its center, and in translation and rotation therefore that
we have a notion of an immense expansion, however that is an
appearance of the effect of the translation and rotation of the
galaxies, therefore of the the opposite they would be infinitely
distant one of the others, being impossible to register its same
position or any form of light, even though of the Sun. A time that
possesss infinite origin and constant production.
Therefore we have notion of that all are if distanciando of the Sun,
therefore with rotation and translation effect Doppler for red is
registered with big intensity, and that it gives an appearance of that
the Sun is in the center of the universe, therefore the movement is
translacional and rotational of that of removal.
If the expansion was product of a great explosion the galaxies
infinitely distant and already would be parked in the space. Thus, for
being possible to detect the appearance of the galaxies and its
dynamics, it evidences that the universe did not originate from a
great explosion and nor the supposed expansion is product of a great
explosion, then the universe is infinitely old, and its supposed
expansion is origin and product of its maser, and is braked by the
dense space. E has left of that we detect as expansion is the
appearance of the translation and rotation of the galaxies.
With the time for the formation of the substance, with the time of the
evolution of the chemical elements, formation of the astros,
esferficação of the external structure of the astros, if see that
the universe is infinitely old, then if the supposed expansion is
related to supposed a great explosion would not give to detect the
existence of the galaxies in the space, therefore they would be
infinitely distant.
As also, of where the substance would appear to produce a great
explosion.
The origin of the substance for the dense space, evolution of the
chemical elements, formation and esferificação almost that perfect
of the astros, layers of atmosphere and structure of the astros and
the existence of the galaxies it confirms the theory of the origin of
the universe for the dense space, the production of the universe for
the physical interactions and fusing. E the dynamics for the energy,
impulse for the maser and the physical interactions, as also the
cosmic brake of the dynamics of the astros for the dense space. Thus,
the universe was not produced at one alone moment in a great explosion
and also it does not meet in expansion, but yes in a minimum and
insignificant removal, billions of lesser times of that any speed of
translation and is easy to visualize.
If the planet Neptune has as many kilometers of removal of the Sun and
it it developed today until how many rollbacks around the Sun and with
that speed. This calculation serves for any astro.
CALCULATION OF REMOVAL OF THE UNIVERSE.
Removal in km of the elementary school/number of rollbacks on the
elementary school * arc of
distancia in km of the translation = the approach value of one removal
astro since the beginning of its formation.
Example.
The ray of the Sun until the Land has 150.000.000 of km, being that I
circulate it in rollback it has 3,5 times approximately this ray, and
that the Land already gave 1.000.000 of rollbacks more than, or
either, to calculate the removal of the Land, have that
Amaltéia satellite if evidences that it folloies with its translation
the Jupiter rotation, as a son next to the mother.
This in only comes to confirm them the displayed one until here, that
the satellites if originate from filaments of gases of the atmosphere
of the planets, and that the translation if originates together with
the origin of the proper satellite, or same can be said that they
before exactly of being one astro already meet in dynamics.
The rotation of the elementary school espirala and condenses next to
the equator the atmosphere, where of this espiralamento of gases goes
to form new astros, that these gases already meet in translacional
dynamics and variation and density in its form and structure.
The gas that forms a spiral cinturão if processes and moves for one
alone point next to the equator, for two reasons, magnetism of astro
and centrifuga of rotation, where it goes to start to give beginning
to a sphere, that is the esferificação process that will become in
astro. To if forming it it will be distanciará giving condition other
successive ones that they will come if to structuralize.
Thus, the paths are,
1-Formação of the atmosphere for the maser, and shift of this
atmosphere on astro for the proper action of the maser.
2-Espiralamento of the atmosphere for the rotation of astro and shift
of the atmosphere, that if dislocates next to the equator.
3-Esferificação of this spiral atmosphere with translation.
4-A sphere beyond the translation and removal that already possuía,
also passes if to distanciar of the elementary school that formed it.
E the process continues, while astro if moves away and translada, also
starts to produce its rotation.
Therefore that amount of translation, removal and rotation depend on
all energy in processing of astro, that it goes to produce all maser
of astro in the space. E therefore that when aging all dynamics tends
to diminish, therefore already spent almost everything that could.
FREE DYNAMICS, PROPER And DECREASING For the ENERGY.
One confirms that the dynamics is proper of astro and proportional its
energy, and that the astros are free in the space, and this freedom
and maser make with that they move away themselves from its elementary
schools. Soon, if they move away themselves for maser cannot be
attracted.
CONCLUSION.
COSMOFÍSICA.
Considerações.
Tests of that the universe is processes of infinite estruturação.
What test that the universe if structure for a slow process is through
the esferificação of the astros and that the land to be formed of
core and layers, therefore test that the astros are formed of
overlapping of small materials that had been expelled by others.
Therefore if the universe was produced at one moment for a great
explosion the land alone would be formed by a inteiriço tablet. With
the esferificação and layers if test that the universe is billions
of older times of the one than if it thinks today.
E if is infinitely old and considering the speed and the appearance
for the observed red, with this if it concludes that we would not see
the sun and no star in the space, therefore the time that if finds in
speed they would be infinitely distant, and would not be capable to
observe none astro in the space.
Considerações on a theory of cosmology and astronomy.
A theory of cosmology and astronomy must be based on the general
universe, of the origin of the substance, of particles, origin of the
chemical elements and its estruturação, processing, and evolution,
nuclear fusing of the astros, maser, temperature, estruturação and
structure of the astros, the universe as a system in evolution in its
constitution macro, generality and micron.
What it is the universe. It is dense space, densificada substance,
processes and structure, streams and evolution, without beginning and
end.
The structure of the dense space. As the gases that are light,
invisible and they float the dense space is millions of times less
densificado.
False hypothesis of the great explosion. Everything before blowing up
first has that to be formed of some element, or some structure of
substance or dense space, then the hypothesis of the great explosion
is false.
On the cosmological time.
The cosmological time is the time that represents the energy and
processing in a system of astros.
Cosmofísica.
Universe of lowermost processes.
What componhe and determines cosmo in its structure is its physical
processes,
production of particles and chemical elements and its evolution, in
the cores where the fusing estelares happens, or either, the universe
micron determines the macro and the generality, a system of galaxies
alone goes to confide conforms the intensity of physical processes
that are produced in the system. It will have chemical lights and
forms and streams, components, fusing in agreement the general
physical processing.
Of the multiplicity of the universe.
The universe is multiple, or either, is several in some periods of
training of origin, processing, estruturação, stream and
disintegration. It has origin for the density of the space that forms
the substance, later the energy and during the process he forms the
chemical elements and the astros.
Of the stream of the universe.
The universe if structure of are for inside [ for integration of the
dense space ] after inside for are [ for disintegration of the
substance ] for the processes and fusing of the substance and in the
cores of the astros. It comes back if to reintegrate forming astros
minors and with little energy, later if disintegrates in maser, and if
it reintegrates in astro, and the stream and processes it continues
until the substance if to become diffuse and with little energy.
As example if it has of the dense space and the substance, of the
substance to astro, the star that produces maser, that go to produce
planets, that goes to produce maser and atmosphere, that goes to
produce maser, rings and satellites, and the stream and estruturantes
and desistruturantes processes continue infinitely until the diffuse
substance.
Where it takes the substance to evolve and to produce the elements
chemical. Thus the universe is infinite and without definitive form.
Thus, the universe if finds in contraction and internal widening, but
not in expansion and yes in lowermost removal, if it finds in
translation and rotation, estruturação, streams and evolution of its
components. While some start its origin, others meet in streams and
processes, while others already meet in the final phase that is in
diffuse substance.
Nuclear Cosmofísica. Nuclear fusing.
The nuclear fusing of the stars keeps for a good time the temperature
of the astros, with this it makes with that the universe if processes
slowly, and can keep its stream and evolution of the substance and
chemical elements and helps it transforms it light elements into
heavy, and goes to produce the energy and dynamics of the astros, for
that secondary the most distant ones possess dynamic little and the
orbits are more irregular. Or either, satellites of planets, planets
of stars.
Thus, the universe and its stream and estruturação if must its
production of energy, as also the evolution of the elements and the
dynamics of the astros.
The energy production goes to also determine the layers and
esferificação of the astros. Not expansionista and not stationary
universe. Thus one confirms that the universe if finds in lowermost
removal and not in expansion, and it does not meet parked therefore
possesss rotation, translation, streams, evolution and other
phenomena.
Evolutivo. One meets in evolution in its structure micron and macro,
of the elements to the astros. E if eternalizes as substance with
diffuse density. He is not arched and nor straight. Comment. The
theory of the energeticidade and maser that deals with astronomy will
be presented in another text. With more than one hundred and ten
formulas proving the two theories, therefore use diameter, maser,
temperature, rotation and equatorial speed. Distancia E not use mass
or gravitation
A criticism of ID from philosophy of science:
http://ottoneurathsboat.blogspot.com/2009/11/evolution-empiricism-and-purposeness.html
Basically: ID confound what amounts to be a scientific explanation