Nephilim Skeletons again, Superhero geekness.
March 27, 2008 in ANSWERING COMMENTS, Nephilim Skeletons, SUPERHEROES, THE SIMPSONS NEWS
THE SIMPSONS NEWS
Not much to tell about work today. Just continuing to do layout revisions on act II of show 17.
I did go to the comic store this Wednesday with my friends though. I saw Bruce Timm buying comic there again…speaking of Bruce Timm…lets talk about…
SUPERHEROES
I’m such a huge Superhero GEEK. Man, I loooovve superheroes. I love their comic and their animated shows too. The animated shows have been great since the first season of the WB Bruce Timm animated Batman TV show. I’ve recently become aware that there’s a new Spiderman cartoon out right now. The Spectacular Spiderman. I love it. It’s great! The designs are interesting. Very pushed and very very very cartoony. It’s well written, fun and funny too. Me likey! Takes me back to the days when I used to read the comic. I also like the fact that he’s still in high school in this show. I never liked the fact they took him out of high school so fast in the movies. It makes for better drama if he has to deal with teenager things while being a superhero. Here’s a bit from an episode. Enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUKJhhmDnw
If it doesn’t load, click here.
Another show that has caught my interest, is the second season of Legion of Superheroes. I caught a few episodes of the first season and I liked it. The superheroes in the show are really young and the writing is skewed for a younger audience so it wasn’t as mature as other animated Superhero shows I’ve watched. Still, I liked the designs and it had Superman in it so I can’t complain. Season two of Legion of Superheroes looks like it’s changing the formula a little bit. The heroes, while still young, are actually quite a bit older. The story telling is still a bit shallow but if you like super fights, you won’t be disappointed. I saw the first two episodes and it seemed that all they did was fight in the show. Again, I’m not going to complain, it’s got Superman in it. In fact it has TWO Supermans. The show has invented a new Superman character called Superman X. A clone of Superman from the 41st Century (the Legion is from the 31st). Imagine a Superman with the personality of Batman and a few extra powers for good measure and you get Superman X. He’s actually kinda cool. All the flaws of Batman and all the powers of Superman makes for an interesting character. Here’s a bit of the first episode from the second season.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOBJIrm5dnY
If it doesn’t load, click here
It’s funny but the Superman X design reminds me a little of Tom Welling, who plays Clark Kent on the Smallville television show. To show you what I mean, here’s a clip of one of my all time favorite Smallville moments (if you haven’t seen the show, the woman with Clark is his mother Martha and the bald guy on the plane is Lex Luthor):
If it doesn’t load, click here
You might be thinking that I’m making it up when I say that I’ve seen animated Superhero shows that were a bit more mature than Legion of Superheroes. I’m not. The Bruce Timm produced animated Superhero shows where actually really well written and some shows had entire seasons that where mindbogglingly good. Here’s an example from one of my three favorite Batman episodes from the first season of the WB (not the Fox) Batman animated show. From the moment this episode began, I was glued to my TV but when it got to this point in the story, my jaw hit the floor:
If it doesn’t load, click here
Of course there is plenty of mindless fighting in these animated shows too but they are so much more satisfying when they have a long story behind them. For example, the Bruce Timm produced Superman animated show introduced Darkseid into the animated show continuity. During the next three seasons of the Superman animated show he became Superman’s number one enemy to get under his skin. Darkseid did some terrible things to Superman. The Justice League and Justice League Unlimited shows, continued the Darkseid story line using the Superman animated show as part of it’s continuity. This gave the animosity that Superman felt for Darkseid a great history. So when he shows up one final time, Superman takes off the kid gloves. Here’s a small clip of what happens:
If it doesn’t load, click here
These moments are great pay offs for fans of the show who’ve watched the shows from the first season of the WB Animated Batman, all the way through to the last Cartoon Network Justice League Unlimited episodes (because they tell one big story). I highly recommend them. If you love Superheroes and you haven’t seen these animated shows, rent or buy them. They’re worth it.
NEPHILIM SKELETONS
By far the most popular post I have on this blog is the one called Nephilim skeletons, writer’s strike offspring, Munchkin goes to work.
It’s because of the Nephilim Skeleton pictures on it. I’ve gotten a few comments about the pictures I’ve put up. One of them in particular pointed out something about this picture:
Which I was using to disprove this one:
This is how it read:
Comment from Baal:
Actually the Cornell University image was poorly done look at the wooden plank at the upper right, notice the shadow? It does not line with the shadowing in the rest of the pic. Its shadow goes southeast the others follow southwest. This is only going to have conspirators wondering more now as was the original of the skeleton still possibly creditable material? And more importantly is it trying to be debunked in a coverup by someone to trick people into the notion its a joke. I read ARAMCO oil company was responsible for its finding in Saudi Arabia then military supposedly took over the dig site. I dont know the truth here just giving some thoughts.
I took a look at what he was saying and I thought he was right. At first I thought that the area might be lit by two different light sources but I rid myself of that idea. If you notice how cast shadows fall in a situation with two different light sources, you will notice that you get double shadows. Ever been in a stadium at night with the flood lights making everyone cast three or four cast shadows? Also, if you were to walk between two lit lamp posts at night you cast two shadows.
Thing is, the posts don’t have two shadows so either this photo is fake and the person who manipulated it did a lousy job or something else is going on.
Upon closer inspection I’ve found that the later is true. Something else is going on. This photo is not fake and here’s why. As an artist, I work with shadows a lot. I observe and draw the world around me a lot. I’ve often seen that reality seems to do some strange things when you observe it from certain angles. Often, an artist is drawing something and it looks odd from his perspective so he changes reality and makes it consistent so it doesn’t look like they’ve made a mistake. Many times, I’ve had drawing teachers that have told me to do so, so that a drawing reads better. If I was to draw that photo I would probably change the way the cast shadow falls so it would look right.
The truth is, the reason the shadow looks wrong, is because of our vantage point. The posts sticking out of the ground, give the impression that they are all sticking straight up, but what if they are not? If they are not and one of the posts is leaning to one side, then that means the cast shadow of that post is going to fall different than all the others, even though from above that post looks like it’s sticking straight up. This is why I still think the picture is real.
If my terribly, crappy drawing above isn’t enough to convince you, then test it out yourself. Take a pencil or pen, a lamp or a flash light and go to a table. Prop the pencil or pen straight up and shine the light on it so that it casts a shadow. Note how the shadow falls. Now, lean the pen or pencil to the right or to the left without leaning it toward or away from the light. Note how the shadow falls. Problem solved.
There was another comment I would like to respond to that went like this:
Comment from Jeff:
Bullsh*t, the third picture down is real. They want you to believe it’s fake, but in the coming weeks and months, you will start to hear about these mysterious findings. Even in our own backyard. Stay tuned to Lou Dobbs on CNN!!!
Don’t know anything about Lou Dobbs but I will say this about the photo he’s referring to, you can clearly see the remnants of the original photograph in the doctored photograph. I’ll show you what I mean:
I would love it if these skeletons where actually found and that these photographs were real, but the truth is that, (at least this one photo) is not. It’s some sort of prank. Sorry. [EDIT: I’ve just been informed that the this photo was made specifically for a Photoshop contest. It won third place. This is the site for the contest: Worth1000.com. They’ve got other weird Photoshoped photos there.]
If you like what you read, please consider signing up to my rss feed.
Comments are appreciated as well.
I also have a store. Click Here and check it out.
If you would like to have a text ad on my site, click on the red BUY LINKS button under the Archives list.
And while you’re at it, please Digg me too.
Writing this blog is almost a part time job for me. Tips are most welcome.
the two poles on the right side seems to point at the same direction and still they have diferent shadows… Is that possible?
Thanks for the question Oscar,
The answer is, yes. It doesn’t seem like the poles are 100% perpendicular to the ground. If they are slanted in anyway, they will cast different cast shadows. Also, depending on how close or how far the light source is, they will cast different shadows as well.
Ah…its a Fake…just look at the guy in the left bottom corner in both the photos. Strangely both are exactly the same……..hmmmm
Yes, very good. That’s the obvious way to see how they are fake. Unfortunately, some people think the one with the posts is the fake one saying it’s a doctored photo from the government to hide the truth. This is obviously not the case.
The giant skeleton photo was done for a photoshop contest for a site called worth1000.com you’re all idiots if you believed for a second it was real. this photo is what got me into photoshop. it took me 2 hours to trace it to the source while you lot were arguing over wether it was real or not. check out the site, it’s a great community and you’ll also see that by posting that picture you’re violating copyright.
by the way http://www.worth1000.com/contest.asp?contest_id=447&display=photoshop this is the picture in it’s original context just scroll down to third place.
no shit but why tha ground behind the diger is faked by luis look more carefull and you shall see that the groud in no explanation is ok and than luis coment it it apears like was done by photoshop strainge isn’t it :D..luis Luis luis stop fulling us
Alias, thank you for the comment. I wasn’t quite sure what you were trying to say here, but I think I’ve finally understood what you are saying and I see that there is a bit of a misunderstanding about what I meant. I wasn’t saying the ground was fake, I was saying that the TRANSITION from the ground in the original photo and the sandy rocky ground it becomes, was poorly done.
Thankyou so much! I have a very open mind as the result of my religious(corrrection:spiritual) beliefs. I mean, if you’re going to believe in the ability to walk on water then you should be open minded to a lot of things. But at the same time my deceased Dad was a Geologist. And so, I’ve been raised to to stick with the facts.
I hate Bull#@!$. It does more harm than good. There are enough things in the Universe such as Quantam Physics that clearly show that many mind boggling things are possible without having to resort to trickery. For example; I had several Physicists here in Louisiana tell me straight out that it’s not a theory, it is a proven fact that an object can be at two places at one time. It sounds crazy, but the Universe is becoming more unbelievable as we get closer to understanding it. I do believe in a lot of things but it would be nice to have some good hard evidence for a change.
Best wishes.
Thanks for the compliment Peter. I try.
i think someones missin something…
have you heard of the nephilim unearthed in india because of the tsunami?
was it a fake?
or you never broaden you view that there is a possibility bout these ancient pre-great flood giants?
maybe this ones a fake,,,maybe,but giants are true according to the book of genesis..i know and maybe you have red that.
thanx
Steve Quayle spoke about Nephilim on COAST TO COAST AM tonight. Pretty crazy stuff. http://www.stevequayle.com/index.html
which photo is fake? Ya keep covering up truth!
What can you say about the second picture o this link:
http://images.google.gr/images?hl=el&um=1&q=nephilim&sa=N&start=0&ndsp=20
?
Nothing for or against. I think it’s the most compelling one of the three pictures.
I’m talking about this photo:
http://images.google.gr/imgres?imgurl=http://www.gossipcraze.com/_mm/_d/_ext2/53593/big_Nephilim01.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.gossipcraze.com/gossip/nephilim&usg=__St-nIpRMYn2t2BE059g45LNoHTE=&h=330&w=480&sz=38&hl=el&start=2&um=1&tbnid=8uXxQrfSn8kqvM:&tbnh=89&tbnw=129&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dnephilim%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Del%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1
Do you think is a fake?
Right, I understand. I put that picture up on a previous blog post (http://www.luisescobarblog.com//?p=86) but as of the time of this writing, it’s having trouble displaying. I’m in the process of fixing it right now. It was one of the three pictures I put up when first writing about these pictures.
This is what I wrote about it:
“I don’t know, the lighting on the man doesn’t match the lighting on the skeleton so the photo seems doctored.”
As I wrote above. I think that picture, out of the three, is the most compelling. My question is, if it’s NOT fake, why are there no other pictures from different angles?
another note…. how come that the bones in the first pictures (with the wrongshadow casts) are so clean…they dug them up from dirt…how come they look arranged like that, is this the way physical remains look when they are unearthed after decades of decay? It looks they were thrown like a copple of dices the first picture is a remaster to cover things up! I don’t know about the second picture but after studying that one it looks more real and logical however surreal.
Nice peace of work!
Google image search leads to Cornell Universties original page:
http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/outreach/mastodon/
http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/outreach/mastodon/aerial-views.html
You are right, the one post with the not-matching shaddow is not uprigt. This can be seen on the overview picutre. The detail picture is a turned part of the overview picture from the top left. The slanted post is in the center of the overview picture.
yeah this pic is photo shopped to make it look fake. you even have the original posted above it. and it doesnt have the smooth soil texture. you just proved you are out to disprove archaeology. Besides what you fools think. The truth is still out there.
Aaron, your attention to detail is that of a prepubescent chimpanzee. The real photo (from Cornell) shows the soil underneath the skeleton is that light brown that was “photoshopped onto the corner to make it look photoshopped”. In the obviously photoshopped one, the dirt is dark under the remains to feign digging, but the transition to the soil in the corner, which is the same shade as in the original from cornell, was abrupt, showing obvious signs of tamper, and although I agree the truth is out there, ignorantly persisting that photos like these are true makes the rest of us truth seekers look as stupid as you